skip to: onlinetools | mainnavigation | content | footer

The Flow Lab

Fluid flowing through a fracture

Flow In Textured Fracture — Pulse of red fluid (false colored) flows through a facture filled with water and entrapped air.


Page Contact

Robert J. Glass
rjglass@sandia.gov
(505) 844-5606


Related Links
RJ Glass Website

Flow And Transport Processes Lab: Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPL) Lab

The transmitted light technique was used to visualize multi-phase flow in macro-heterogeneous sand packs. Our goals were to observe non-wetting phase (oils) infiltration and redistribution in water saturated sand and then study remediation techniques. We used a small (1-foot x 2-feet) chamber for technical development and then built a larger (2-feet x 2-feet) chamber for remediation experiments.

Here is more backround on the DNAPL Lab.

Soltrol 130 Experiments

Soltrol-130 injected into the saturated pack.

Three experiments were performed in a 1x2 foot chamber using the relatively innocuous, lighter than water NAPLs Soltrol-220 and Soltrol-130. We used these experiments to develop our techniques. In this photo the red dyed Soltrol was injected at the bottom of the macro-heterogeneous sand pack and it percolated upward. The experiment ended when the Soltrol reached the top of the chamber. Non-wetting phase redistribution over time led to the build up of Soltrol at the top of the chamber.

TCE-1 Experiment

A view of the experiment on the test stand.

This sand pack was constructed with a 50-70 sand barrier that blocked the infiltration of the non-wetting Trichloroethylen (TCE) and caused the TCE to backfill a major portion of the 12-20 and 30-40 sand. It was very interesting overall. We also tried to run the TCE infiltration at a lower flow rate than previously, 0.5 ml/min, but because this was our first experiment with TCE we didnít have the proper hardware and ended up melting flow fittings during the test. For this reason there were multiple flow rates in this test and several pauses, while we replaced fittings and refilled lines.

For More Information

Glass, R.J., S.H. Conrad, and W. Peplinski, Gravity destabilized non-wetting phase invasion in macroheterogneous porous media: Experimental observations of invasion dynamics and scale analysis, Water Resources Research, 36:11:3121-3137, 2000.

TCE-2 Experiment

MIP modeling of processed data.

In this experiment we spent a considerable amount of time perfecting our method of CO2 delivery to the chamber so that we could measure pressure and flow rate. Flow rate varies constantly with pressure so rates were recorded using a video camera. Pressure was measured with a transducer and recorded digitally. We perfected the grain alignment processing technique on these tests so the digital images are in very nice condition. A major part of these tests was the "throbbing analyses" which quantified the pulsing of CO2 as it passed through capillary barriers in the 30-40 sand. We finished the test by injecting TCE into the pack and observing its redistribution.

For More Information

Glass, R.J, and L. Yarrington, Mechanistic modeling of fingering, nonmonotonicity, fragmentation, and pulsation within gravity/buoyant destabilized two-phase/unsaturated flow, Water Resources Research, 39(3), 1058, doi:10.1029/2002WR001542, 2003.

TCE-3 Experiment

TCE mobilized with surfactant

This was the first experiment in the new 2x2 foot chamber. It was done to look at behavior of TCE in the presence of MA-80I surfactant. The surfactant flood mobilized the TCE rather than simply dissolving it. Most of the TCE fell to the bottom of the chamber, out of sight in the 50-70 sand. Dissolution proceeded from that point but we got very small recoveries, as shown by the gas chromatograph data, because most of the TCE was out of the main flow field.

TCE-4 Experiment

The effect of Potassium Permanganate on TCE.

Tween-80 surfactant did a better job of dissolving the TCE without mobilizatron but it seems rather thick and gooey if it comes in contact with air. On this test we got much better recovery based on GC data as well as visual inspection. A small pool was left at the very bottom of the chamber where the flow field just skimmed the top of the TCE. Further experimentation in this sand pack included Partitioning Tracer Test and then a short flood of Potassium Permanganate, shown at left, to observe its remediation qualities.

For More Information

Conrad, S.A., R.J. Glass, and W. Peplinski, DNAPL remediation experiments in macro-heterogeneous sand, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 58, 13-49, 2002.

Other Experiments

Other experiments conducted in the DNAPL Lab or related to this work are described in these publications.

Ji, S.H., I.W. Yeo, K.K. Lee, and R.J. Glass, Influence of ambient groundwater flow on DNAPL migration in a fracture network: Experiments and simulations, Geophysical Research Letters, 30(10), 1504, doi:10.1029/2003GL017064, 2003.

Detwiler R., H. Rajaram, and R.J. Glass, Nonaqueous-phase liquid dissolution in variable-aperture fractures: Development of a depth-averaged computational model and comparison to a physical experiment, Water Resources Research, 37:12:3115-3129, 2001.

Sandia Flow Lab Web Contact